<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Artificial Ignorance - Latest Comments in FUD 101</title><link>http://artificialignorance.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://artificialignorance.disqus.com/fud_101/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:01:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: FUD 101</title><link>http://www.artificialignorance.net/blog/oss/fud-101/#comment-9152130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;:) Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anandiyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:01:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FUD 101</title><link>http://www.artificialignorance.net/blog/oss/fud-101/#comment-9147029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Matt’s a good journalist"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You kinda lost me here.  Please expand on this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay Cuthrell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 22:30:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FUD 101</title><link>http://www.artificialignorance.net/blog/oss/fud-101/#comment-9142751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;umm... just to be clear: that wasn't ME tweet-ripping on Google, that was someone else i OH'd making that comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i thought it was funny, but i have no particular opinion about either Google or MSFT re: their use of open source code.  both companies use proprietary and open source.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and in fact these days, both companies share some of the same employee DNA, so no surprise either way ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave McClure</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:04:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>